Development and design

"Revolution through evolution" that's how the development process of the Mentor 3 can be summarised.

The Mentor 2 was our foundation for the Mentor 3: we wanted to refine and improve its well proven characteristics.

The first prototypes showed the huge potential for performance improvements in seemingly small details. That's why it wasn't necessary to change the basic design of the Mentor 2.

Therefore, the Mentor 3 is the result of several well-conceived optimisation measures. The technical basic data stayed almost the same. But the leap in performance is the biggest we ever achieved from one model generation to the next.


Flying the Mentor 3

Mentor 2 pilots will immediately feel familiar with its successor: The Mentor 3 offers the same level of stability, robustness and precision.

The brake pressure got less and the turning ability has improved. The Mentor 3 can be piloted more relaxed and even more efficiently in thermals than its predecessor. The feedback the pilot receives is gentler, yet very precise.

The outstanding stability across the entire speed range stayed the same, just with a significantly better glide ratio and with a slightly improved top-end speed.


The results of our extensive test flights with the Mentor 2 in turbulent air were confirmed: after more than two years, almost 3000 wings and many thousand hours in various conditions, the Mentor 2 has established itself as a very stable and reliable glider.

The DHV also confirmed that the statistical accident analysis shows a very small number of Mentor 2 incidents, based on the number of gliders sold.

One reason for the high level of safety is the very small aspect ratio. This leads to easy handling behaviour as well as a considerable safety advantage in the case of a big collapse: the glider's reaction is more manageable and the risk of a cravat is reduced.

The basic design (planform, aspect ratio, curvature, airfoil, etc.) wasn't changed on the Mentor 3. Accordingly, our tests in bumpy air showed the same stability and even slightly more damping of turbulence. We are confident that the Mentor 3 will continue the legacy of the Mentor 2 as a safe and predictable high-level B glider.



Glide performance is important. But what really matters is the usability of the performance potential in actual conditions.

Pilots need a wing they can rely on. They need a very stable wing as well as a comfortable level of damping. This ultimately leads to the "overall performance" which made the Mentor 2 so successful.

The Mentor 3 doesn't just have a better glide ratio (increased by 0.6 across the whole speed range), we also managed to provide the pilot with better handling behaviour and with a slightly higher level of damping. We think that this makes it even easier to use the glider's high performance.

Technical changes compared to Mentor 2

  • 3 D Shaping: we didn't invent it, but it's the first time you see this technique on a Nova wing. The 3 D Shaping technique helps to achieve a cleaner leading edge by connecting several convex fabric pieces on the glider's nose.
  • Optimised stabilo: The shape of the stabilo is crucial for a gliders performance. We made some small changes which significantly reduced the drag.
  • New shape of the leading edge and the intakes: the design of the intake determines the internal pressure, which determines a glider's characteristics (for example for the stability). We tried many different shapes (first in computer simulation, then in flight tests) until we were finally able to improve this part of the wing as well.
  • New brake geometry and reefing system: we could reduce the line length and at the same time improve the handling characteristics.

Pilots demands

further information about the pilot's profile

LTF/EN test reports:

Mentor 3 XXS, Mentor 3 XS, Mentor 3 S, Mentor 3 M, Mentor 3 L